<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Workaround: Gnome-Do Docky in Fedora 12</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fergytech.com/2009/12/workaround-gnome-do-docky-in-fedora-12/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fergytech.com/2009/12/workaround-gnome-do-docky-in-fedora-12/</link>
	<description>The lovechild of technology and mayhem!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 16:42:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://www.fergytech.com/2009/12/workaround-gnome-do-docky-in-fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-1350</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 19:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fergytech.com/?p=748#comment-1350</guid>
		<description>Hey OCM,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Were you able to successfully do the group installs and other dependencies before trying to compile the gnome-do source file? What distro are you running btw?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey OCM,</p>
<p>Were you able to successfully do the group installs and other dependencies before trying to compile the gnome-do source file? What distro are you running btw?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Call Merch</title>
		<link>http://www.fergytech.com/2009/12/workaround-gnome-do-docky-in-fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-1349</link>
		<dc:creator>One Call Merch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fergytech.com/?p=748#comment-1349</guid>
		<description>i am getting soooooooooooo many errors and core file dumps  No such file or directory ,,, think i&#039;ll forget about this,,, maybe some other time, been trying sort it for a few days now,,,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am getting soooooooooooo many errors and core file dumps  No such file or directory ,,, think i&#39;ll forget about this,,, maybe some other time, been trying sort it for a few days now,,,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Istvan Cebrian</title>
		<link>http://www.fergytech.com/2009/12/workaround-gnome-do-docky-in-fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-1276</link>
		<dc:creator>Istvan Cebrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fergytech.com/?p=748#comment-1276</guid>
		<description>Just tried this on FC13 Beta. However I didnt want to install the entire development groups... the following packages sufficed for building:

yum install gtk2-devel gnome-sharp-devel gnome-desktop-sharp-devel gnome-keyring-sharp-devel mono-addins-devel ndesk-dbus-devel ndesk-dbus-glib-devel notify-sharp-devel GConf2-devel intltool gtk-sharp2-gapi mono-devel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just tried this on FC13 Beta. However I didnt want to install the entire development groups&#8230; the following packages sufficed for building:</p>
<p>yum install gtk2-devel gnome-sharp-devel gnome-desktop-sharp-devel gnome-keyring-sharp-devel mono-addins-devel ndesk-dbus-devel ndesk-dbus-glib-devel notify-sharp-devel GConf2-devel intltool gtk-sharp2-gapi mono-devel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FergatROn</title>
		<link>http://www.fergytech.com/2009/12/workaround-gnome-do-docky-in-fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>FergatROn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fergytech.com/?p=748#comment-836</guid>
		<description>Thank you To&#241;o for leaving a comment. Funny though... with all the comment spam we bloggers have to deal with now-a-days, even a simple well-intended comment such as yours leaves me wondering if &quot;Tono&quot; is a real person. ;) Either way, you&#039;re welcome. I&#039;m glad you found it helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you To&ntilde;o for leaving a comment. Funny though&#8230; with all the comment spam we bloggers have to deal with now-a-days, even a simple well-intended comment such as yours leaves me wondering if &#8220;Tono&#8221; is a real person. <img src='http://www.fergytech.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Either way, you&#8217;re welcome. I&#8217;m glad you found it helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toño</title>
		<link>http://www.fergytech.com/2009/12/workaround-gnome-do-docky-in-fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-834</link>
		<dc:creator>Toño</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fergytech.com/?p=748#comment-834</guid>
		<description>Thanks....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FergatROn</title>
		<link>http://www.fergytech.com/2009/12/workaround-gnome-do-docky-in-fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>FergatROn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 14:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fergytech.com/?p=748#comment-820</guid>
		<description>Yah, the US Patent Office is a complete joke. I sure hope that system is changes. Well thanks for the informative comment. It looks like every Fedora user should install RPMFusion&#039;s repo as a common practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yah, the US Patent Office is a complete joke. I sure hope that system is changes. Well thanks for the informative comment. It looks like every Fedora user should install RPMFusion&#8217;s repo as a common practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nushio</title>
		<link>http://www.fergytech.com/2009/12/workaround-gnome-do-docky-in-fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-795</link>
		<dc:creator>Nushio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 18:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fergytech.com/?p=748#comment-795</guid>
		<description>The branching out was already happening, regardless of Fedora&#039;s actions. 

The reason RPMFusion is in the clear, is that it&#039;s not US-Based. This means that US Patents don&#039;t apply to them, where as Fedora, being US-Based, has to obey the silly american laws. 

The specific point i&#039;m against is actually looking through the US Patent office just to see what violations you can find in the software you provide. Its ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The branching out was already happening, regardless of Fedora&#8217;s actions. </p>
<p>The reason RPMFusion is in the clear, is that it&#8217;s not US-Based. This means that US Patents don&#8217;t apply to them, where as Fedora, being US-Based, has to obey the silly american laws. </p>
<p>The specific point i&#8217;m against is actually looking through the US Patent office just to see what violations you can find in the software you provide. Its ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FergatROn</title>
		<link>http://www.fergytech.com/2009/12/workaround-gnome-do-docky-in-fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>FergatROn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 13:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fergytech.com/?p=748#comment-791</guid>
		<description>I guess being preemptive is good, but if I understand your statements - Tom did this without there being any hint of legal action. This is just a hunch, or an educated guess. If we did that for apps in general, we&#039;d really be crippling software development. Thus this awesome &quot;Docky&quot; option, so nicely packaged within Gnome-Do, now has to branch off into a new project based on a hunch.

I&#039;ve been using Linux exclusively for about a year or so. So; I&#039;m not fully there yet when it comes to the politics of package development/management, repos, legalities, etc.

I&#039;m guessing that Fedora doesn&#039;t want to be caught up in possible legal stuff, but RPMFusion is fine with it? So; Gnome-Do will be in the Fedora repos and Docky will be in RPMFusion repo. If that&#039;s the case, then from a user perspective we still haven&#039;t lost anything... just another package to install.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess being preemptive is good, but if I understand your statements &#8211; Tom did this without there being any hint of legal action. This is just a hunch, or an educated guess. If we did that for apps in general, we&#8217;d really be crippling software development. Thus this awesome &#8220;Docky&#8221; option, so nicely packaged within Gnome-Do, now has to branch off into a new project based on a hunch.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using Linux exclusively for about a year or so. So; I&#8217;m not fully there yet when it comes to the politics of package development/management, repos, legalities, etc.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing that Fedora doesn&#8217;t want to be caught up in possible legal stuff, but RPMFusion is fine with it? So; Gnome-Do will be in the Fedora repos and Docky will be in RPMFusion repo. If that&#8217;s the case, then from a user perspective we still haven&#8217;t lost anything&#8230; just another package to install.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nushio</title>
		<link>http://www.fergytech.com/2009/12/workaround-gnome-do-docky-in-fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-785</link>
		<dc:creator>Nushio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 05:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fergytech.com/?p=748#comment-785</guid>
		<description>What DBO said is correct. I&#039;m the gnome-do fedora packager. Tom &quot;spot&quot; Callaway did a preemptive action and removed Docky entirely from gnome-do before receiving any sort of cease and desist. 

As a result, I talked with gnome-do devs who helped me and created the patch to sacrifice the magnification functionality to appease the legal gods. 

As a note, I am against crippled software, and if it wasn&#039;t for the fact that Docky will no longer be shipped in gnome-do in future releases (It will become its own package, named Docky), I would have moved gnome-do to RPMFusion immediately. 

I intend to send Docky to RPMFusion once its ready.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What DBO said is correct. I&#8217;m the gnome-do fedora packager. Tom &#8220;spot&#8221; Callaway did a preemptive action and removed Docky entirely from gnome-do before receiving any sort of cease and desist. </p>
<p>As a result, I talked with gnome-do devs who helped me and created the patch to sacrifice the magnification functionality to appease the legal gods. </p>
<p>As a note, I am against crippled software, and if it wasn&#8217;t for the fact that Docky will no longer be shipped in gnome-do in future releases (It will become its own package, named Docky), I would have moved gnome-do to RPMFusion immediately. </p>
<p>I intend to send Docky to RPMFusion once its ready.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBO</title>
		<link>http://www.fergytech.com/2009/12/workaround-gnome-do-docky-in-fedora-12/comment-page-1/#comment-784</link>
		<dc:creator>DBO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 04:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fergytech.com/?p=748#comment-784</guid>
		<description>I thought I would just let you know that fedora did not remove Docky due to any legal complaints from Apple. They removed it because they *think* there *might* be legal issues (however this has not been verified in a court of law). Apple has thus far done zippo with regard to Docky, this one is squarely on Fedora.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I would just let you know that fedora did not remove Docky due to any legal complaints from Apple. They removed it because they *think* there *might* be legal issues (however this has not been verified in a court of law). Apple has thus far done zippo with regard to Docky, this one is squarely on Fedora.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
